Medical Image Analysis
Volume 15, Issue 2 , Pages 185-201, April 2011

A wavelet-based regularized reconstruction algorithm for SENSE parallel MRI with applications to neuroimaging

  • Lotfi Chaâri

      Affiliations

    • LIGM (UMR-CNRS 8049), Université Paris-Est, Champs-sur-Marne, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée cedex, France
    • CEA/DSV/I2BM/Neurospin, CEA Saclay, Bat. 145, Point Courrier 156, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: LIGM (UMR-CNRS 8049), Université Paris-Est, Champs-sur-Marne, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée cedex, France. Tel.: +33 1 60 95 72 92; fax: +33 1 60 95 72 14.
  • ,
  • Jean-Christophe Pesquet

      Affiliations

    • LIGM (UMR-CNRS 8049), Université Paris-Est, Champs-sur-Marne, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée cedex, France
  • ,
  • Amel Benazza-Benyahia

      Affiliations

    • Ecole Supérieure des Communications de Tunis (SUP’COM-Tunis), URISA, Cité Technologique des Communications, 2083 Tunis, Tunisia
  • ,
  • Philippe Ciuciu

      Affiliations

    • CEA/DSV/I2BM/Neurospin, CEA Saclay, Bat. 145, Point Courrier 156, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France

Received 16 June 2009; received in revised form 17 August 2010; accepted 24 August 2010. published online 01 September 2010.

Research highlights

► Parallel MRI reconstruction using regularization techniques in the wavelet domain. ► Wavelet transforms and sparse representations. ► Proximal Convex optimization algorithms applied complex-valued functions. ► High quality reconstruction at low magnetic field and high reduction factor.

Abstract 

To reduce scanning time and/or improve spatial/temporal resolution in some Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) applications, parallel MRI acquisition techniques with multiple coils acquisition have emerged since the early 1990s as powerful imaging methods that allow a faster acquisition process. In these techniques, the full FOV image has to be reconstructed from the resulting acquired undersampled k-space data. To this end, several reconstruction techniques have been proposed such as the widely-used SENSitivity Encoding (SENSE) method. However, the reconstructed image generally presents artifacts when perturbations occur in both the measured data and the estimated coil sensitivity profiles. In this paper, we aim at achieving accurate image reconstruction under degraded experimental conditions (low magnetic field and high reduction factor), in which neither the SENSE method nor the Tikhonov regularization in the image domain give convincing results. To this end, we present a novel method for SENSE-based reconstruction which proceeds with regularization in the complex wavelet domain by promoting sparsity. The proposed approach relies on a fast algorithm that enables the minimization of regularized non-differentiable criteria including more general penalties than a classical ℓ1 term. To further enhance the reconstructed image quality, local convex constraints are added to the regularization process. In vivo human brain experiments carried out on Gradient-Echo (GRE) anatomical and Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) functional MRI data at 1.5T indicate that our algorithm provides reconstructed images with reduced artifacts for high reduction factors.

Keywords: Parallel MRI, SENSE reconstruction, Regularization, Wavelet transform, Convex optimization

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Part of this work was presented at the ISBI conference in 2008 (Chaâri et al., 2008).

PII: S1361-8415(10)00105-2

doi:10.1016/j.media.2010.08.001

Medical Image Analysis
Volume 15, Issue 2 , Pages 185-201, April 2011