Medical Image Analysis
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 497-504, February 2012

Mitral annulus segmentation from four-dimensional ultrasound using a valve state predictor and constrained optical flow

  • Robert J. Schneider

      Affiliations

    • Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Douglas P. Perrin

      Affiliations

    • Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA, USA
    • Department of Cardiac Surgery, Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
  • ,
  • Nikolay V. Vasilyev

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiac Surgery, Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
  • ,
  • Gerald R. Marx

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
  • ,
  • Pedro J. del Nido

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiac Surgery, Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
  • ,
  • Robert D. Howe

      Affiliations

    • Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA, USA

Received 10 August 2010; received in revised form 14 March 2011; accepted 15 November 2011. published online 06 December 2011.

Graphical abstract

3DMAS Method (3D Mitral Annulus Segmentation Method): Algorithm to segment the mitral valve annulus in a 3D ultrasound frame showing a closed mitral valve.

CLKOF Method (Constrained Lucas and Kanade Optical Flow Method): Geometrically constrained optical flow method designed to robustly track the mitral valve annulus between noisy ultrasound volumes.

Highlights

► 4D mitral annulus segmentation algorithm changes methods based on the valve state. ► Valve state is automatically determined from the 3D ultrasound images. ► Closed valve annuli are directly segmented, whereas open valve annuli are tracked. ► Tracking is done using a geometrically constrained optical flow algorithm. ► Annulus delineations are user-independent given reasonable user inputs.

Abstract 

Measurement of the shape and motion of the mitral valve annulus has proven useful in a number of applications, including pathology diagnosis and mitral valve modeling. Current methods to delineate the annulus from four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound, however, either require extensive overhead or user-interaction, become inaccurate as they accumulate tracking error, or they do not account for annular shape or motion. This paper presents a new 4D annulus segmentation method to account for these deficiencies. The method builds on a previously published three-dimensional (3D) annulus segmentation algorithm that accurately and robustly segments the mitral annulus in a frame with a closed valve. In the 4D method, a valve state predictor determines when the valve is closed. Subsequently, the 3D annulus segmentation algorithm finds the annulus in those frames. For frames with an open valve, a constrained optical flow algorithm is used to the track the annulus. The only inputs to the algorithm are the selection of one frame with a closed valve and one user-specified point near the valve, neither of which needs to be precise. The accuracy of the tracking method is shown by comparing the tracking results to manual segmentations made by a group of experts, where an average RMS difference of 1.67±0.63mm was found across 30 tracked frames.

Keywords: Mitral valve, Annulus, Tracking, Segmentation, Ultrasound

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1361-8415(11)00168-X

doi:10.1016/j.media.2011.11.006

Medical Image Analysis
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 497-504, February 2012